Trans

July 19, 2021
Economist journalist Joyce challenges the idea that “people should count as men or women according to how they feel and what they declare, instead of their biology” in this alarmist critique of “transactivism.” Characterizing gender self-identification as a “belief system” akin to reincarnation, Joyce traces the origins of gender theory to Judith Butler and other feminist academics in the 1990s, and recounts the story of Christine Jorgensen, who became synonymous with “sex change” in the 1950s. Though Joyce acknowledges that a “suffering minority” of people struggle with gender dysphoria (“misery caused by cross-sex feelings”), she contends that “the truth is that we are our bodies, and our bodies are our selves,” and calls the use of hormone blockers to delay puberty in gender-dysphoric children a “medical scandal.” Joyce also suggests links between homophobia and transitioning, and autism and cross-sex identification. Testimonials from “detransitioners” who have returned to identifying as their biological sex buttress Joyce’s arguments, though she makes no effort to speak with people who have happily transitioned, and doesn’t present statistics on how many people come to regret their surgical and hormonal treatments. Ultimately, Joyce’s unwillingness to take the claims of trans people seriously undermines her arguments, and her talk of the billionaires, academics, and profit-hungry healthcare companies behind “gender-identity ideology” has elements of conspiracy thinking. This one-sided takedown comes up short.

Starred review from May 1, 2022
How zealous activists have misrepresented biology and endangered women. Joyce, a senior staff journalist at the Economist, provocatively challenges the now common assumption among progressives that, regarding social classifications, self-determination of gender identity ought to have priority over any underlying biological reality. Offering carefully researched analyses of the scientific view of human sexual dimorphism, the psychology of gender dysphoria, and the medical and personal tolls associated with transitioning, the author argues that a refusal to acknowledge biology has, among other injustices, caused enormous and unnecessary harm to many children and threatened safe spaces for women. Joyce explains how trans-rights ideologues have spread falsehoods about what contemporary research actually demonstrates about the immutability of sex and encouraged an egregiously one-sided public discourse. "When it comes to whether sex or gender identity should take precedence in law and everyday life," writes the author, "the conflict has been treated as if only trans people are affected, and there has been no negotiation at all." Joyce's work is impressively logical, nuanced, and empathetic in restoring balance to such negotiations. Particularly astute is the author's critique of how specialists in the West now typically counsel parents of children who present with gender dysphoria, often resorting to dubious or outright false assertions about how this disorder tends to proceed without medical intervention--or understating the risks of surgery or hormone therapies. Also excellent is her discussion of the practical and moral problems generated by an undiscriminating acceptance of trans women as women in single-sex spaces such as public bathrooms as well as in professional sports and the penal system. Furthermore, Joyce's recommendations for how a just society might balance the rights of trans people with those of the rest of its members are profoundly compelling. An informed, judicious, sensitive consideration of the falsehoods and hazards of contemporary trans activism.

COPYRIGHT(2022) Kirkus Reviews, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.